rml, 4 months ago "If #Lisp is so great, why isn't there a Lisp 2?" There is, lisp is just so great that lisp 1s are better 🤷♀️
"If #Lisp is so great, why isn't there a Lisp 2?"
There is, lisp is just so great that lisp 1s are better 🤷♀️
TheSecondVariation, 4 months ago lisp 0 is when you transcend the prison of variables and namespaces and experience true bliss. @rml
lisp 0 is when you transcend the prison of variables and namespaces and experience true bliss.
@rml
screwtape, 4 months ago @TheSecondVariation @rml I would also accept, "If lisp is so great, why isn't Lisp2?" (It had the PL/I disease: Feature creep but not the PL/I cure: Buckets of money) Of course lisp2 refers to having multiple namespaces now rather than post-lisp-1.6
@TheSecondVariation @rml I would also accept, "If lisp is so great, why isn't Lisp2?" (It had the PL/I disease: Feature creep but not the PL/I cure: Buckets of money) Of course lisp2 refers to having multiple namespaces now rather than post-lisp-1.6
rml, 4 months ago @screwtape @TheSecondVariation honestly? we should forget about this multiple namespace nonsense and RVTRN to languages in one function.
@screwtape @TheSecondVariation honestly? we should forget about this multiple namespace nonsense and RVTRN to languages in one function.
screwtape, 4 months ago @rml what if you want a property list / value / defun connected through sharing a symbol? #tootGoingDownInFlames @TheSecondVariation
@rml what if you want a property list / value / defun connected through sharing a symbol? #tootGoingDownInFlames @TheSecondVariation
rml, 4 months ago @screwtape @TheSecondVariation sorry not sure I understand what you mean
@screwtape @TheSecondVariation sorry not sure I understand what you mean
Add comment