Jain, to random
@Jain@blob.cat avatar

@golem :blobcatgooglynotlikethis: PCIe 7.0 is 4 times faster than PCIe 5.0...
The only reason why it needs to be that fast, are actually nvme's...
How about creating a dedicated bus or still having multiple lanes for older versions, i acutally would prefer having more PCIe lanes and they also dont need to be faster than PCIe 4

RE: https://die-partei.social/users/golem/statuses/110541727504068618

kkarhan,

@whitekiba @Jain @golem I've yet to see it's connector cuz nowhere was I able to find it...

With PCIe 4.0 that was sadly omnitted from the spec.

And yes there are valid reasons for it:
Like industrial -based systems which may even utilize passive that do per , omnitting the need for expensive PCIe .
Kinda like the passive PCIe x16 => 4x NVMe (PCIe x4) cards.

So one would be able to add more stuff onto the backplane...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4qJf50YSVk

kkarhan,

@whitekiba @Jain @golem And yes I'd love to see a vendor-independent x32 if not x64 & x128 connector...

Even if that means some chonky "#OCuLink meets MTP" connector with several fibers to save space...

At least a x32 would make sense even on "consumer grade" systems if we'd embrace #backplanes instead of ATX Motherboards, reducing upgrade costs...

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines