maralorn,
@maralorn@chaos.social avatar

I have real trouble developing an intuition for NoDeepSubsumption.

I always only notice by sheer luck that changing

a . b $ c

to

a $ b $ c

fixes my type error.

BoydStephenSmithJr,
@BoydStephenSmithJr@hachyderm.io avatar

@maralorn I also still have problems with this in , too.

Best tip I have is to pay more attention to the 'forall's. Compose / . / <<< "fixes" the 'forall', which can cause type checking to fail elsewhere or, if "a" is higher-rank, there (it forces "b" to be monomorphic; higher-rank "a" might require a polymorphic "b'). Application / '$' (in GHC) doesn't "fix" the forall.

I think the difference might be "deeper", but for me it's able where the "choice" for the forall is made.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • haskell
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines