enobacon,
@enobacon@urbanists.social avatar

Petition by to fix Oregon's proposed law.

"As currently written, HB 4103:
...would restrict some of the most affordable styles to [16yo and up]
...[allows localities to] ban the use of certain e-bikes from accessing multi-use paths and trails
...Enforcement based on e-bike class will be highly subjective and confusing for users
...Misses the mark on providing a clear definition... [cargo / 4 wheels, bigger motors]"

https://secure.everyaction.com/-b6pbKHC4EuOc0QPk9dtcA2

cy,
@cy@fedicy.us.to avatar

Oh boy, age gating to add needless complexity to the system and justify more funding to the police. Yeah bill 4103 has to die. That petition doesn't say anything about what house bill 4067 is though, while asking me to sign something saying I support it.

enobacon,
@enobacon@urbanists.social avatar

@cy hb4067 is the task force to figure out what e-bike policy would actually make sense

https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2024R1/Measures/Overview/HB4067

cy,
@cy@fedicy.us.to avatar

I suppose I just don't care enough about e-bike policy. "Relating to electric micromobility vehicles; declaring an emergency." What emergency?

enobacon,
@enobacon@urbanists.social avatar

@cy the legislative emergency is a formality that allows it to start on passage instead of next fiscal/legislative year or something. It's still just a task force / study group, nobody is being granted an emergency e-bike dispenser or anything.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • ebikes
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines