caludio,
@caludio@mastodon.social avatar

I believe that Bulma deserves much more credit than it has (very rarely mentioned). Nowadays for some reason everyone and their cousin just pick Tailwind and start building "components" with it or, worse, use a framework ON TOP of tw when you could just use a solid, battery included, modern system like https://bulma.io/

#webdev #css #frontend

danjac,
@danjac@masto.ai avatar

@caludio it depends on use case. Bulma, like Bootstrap, is good if you are fine with a preset "look" to your site you can live with. Tailwind (or custom CSS if you prefer) is for when your designers require a more tailored UI.

caludio,
@caludio@mastodon.social avatar

@danjac I checked bulma yesterday and the customization options are many. My point is not that bulma ia necessarily better, but that many tw use cases are probably better served with bulma

danjac,
@danjac@masto.ai avatar

@caludio certainly (or Bootstrap). The problem is reaching for TW as a default. That said, it really depends on what kind of design team you have to work with, if they are very fussy you can end up in a worse situation with a less flexible framework and a ton of customization on top.

danjac,
@danjac@masto.ai avatar

@caludio I've made the point before: TW is not necessarily good, but rather a solution to a problem in communication and process.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • webdev
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines