Judge dismisses lawsuit against age verification requirement for pornography sites in Utah

FSC made a statement about the decision here: freespeechcoalition.com/…/fsc-will-appeal-decisio…

IANAL, but reading the court’s decision, I think dismissal on 11th amendment grounds is a case study for why states are creating laws that allow for private liability – the “vigilante enforcement” approach. It gives states the ability to create unconstitutional laws without consequence. States can easily create a chilling effect on speech, while preventing plaintiffs from proving standing due to sovereign immunity and no “real” damages having taken place yet.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • utah@lemmy.world
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines