elouboub,
elouboub avatar

While I kinda sympathise, I won't be filing a complaint. I want Youtube to become so shit that even the average user will start looking for alternatives. I want ads plastered everywhere on that site and adblockers to fail miserably at blocking them. I want the average user to be so bothered by the ads that when they stumble upon an alternative they try and convince people to switch. I want content creators to be so bothered by it that they make videos promoting the use of another service.

Make this a competition for alternatives. Don't make it easy for users to stay on Youtube.

vreraan,

Since every person can become a piece of shit, it is useless to constantly change services, so only rules can teach us to live differently from other beasts.

PurplePropagule,

I’m sure content creators will be pissed that more ads are served on their videos haha. Oh no! More money! Whatever will they do? The conversation about ads has two sides where consumers are on one and content creators and youtube are on the other.

While I’d absolutely love for there to be a youtube alternative, they have a pretty much complete monopoly on online video distribution. Hosting all that data is expensive so competitors would need some serious financial backing which would likely put the competitor service in the hands of a large corporation.

Spotlight7573,

The problem I see, is that it wouldn’t actually be more money for the creators despite there being more ads as the user base actually seeing the ads is reduced and the difference has to be made up in volume.

PurplePropagule,

I guess that’s fair. There’s a critical point where that happens though. Even if they doubled the amount of ads right now, I bet they wouldn’t lose too many people because there aren’t any real competitor platforms. The amount of youtube ads right now is still significantly less than the equivalent watch time of cable channels, for example. You can watch 20 mins of content and sit through maybe 3 5 second skippable ads, and 3 20 second ads or something? Still significantly less than tv where you have 15 mins of ads every hour.

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

two sides where consumers are on one and content creators and youtube are on the other.

Youtube and content creators are not on the same side. This woefully reduces a complex problem with many different actors down to a Right Side and a Wrong Side, and anyone whose not on My Side, must be on the Wrong Side.

PurplePropagule,

I’m talking about purely in terms of ads on the video. Both youtube and content creators want as as much ad revenue as possible but not to the point where they lose viewership because of the quantity of ads. I’m not saying content creators are in the wrong, I’m just saying that they get paid based on ads, so of course they want more revenue. It’s just an analysis of the relationship, I’m not pointing blame towards anyone.

JamesFire,

I’m sure content creators will be pissed that more ads are served on their videos haha. Oh no! More money! Whatever will they do?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=_--LvdAHfVo

Broodjefissa,

Ok Satan

Chefdano3,
@Chefdano3@lemm.ee avatar

Cool, so YouTube will start putting pop ups that require you to consent to the detection in order to watch videos. That’s what everyone did with the whole cookies thing when that was determined to be illegal without consent.

ElBarto,
@ElBarto@sh.itjust.works avatar

Nothing more fun than having to go through some websites shitty settings to toggle everything off.

DJDarren,

I can heartily recommend Consent-O-Matic. I’d say that it’s able to clear (and reject by default) the cookie warnings on 95% of the sites I visit.

gohixo9650,

ublock does it too if you enable the “block annoyances” option in the settings

DJDarren,

Sadly, no ublock for me on Safari, but good to know!

ToxicWaste,

Don’t use stupid browsers then ;-)

pathief,
@pathief@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t know why I have not yet donated to these developers. They sure as hell deserve it. As soon as I get home they’re gonna get some moneys!

gohixo9650,

sadly they’re not accepting donations

online,

I bet the list maintainers accept tips!

At the bottom of the uBlock Origin homepage there’s links to the most popular list homepages which would be a good starting point.

The Peter Lowe’s ad tracking list links to its own Patreon: www.patreon.com/blocklist (Confirm by clicking on the link at the uBlock Origin homepage, then at the top click on patreon).

The other ones I couldn’t find any obvious way to donate to the list maintainers.

tch4ng,

Duckduckgo browser does it too

ddkman,

Still a curveball. Collecting your data and having to say ot to your face are not the same.

Rhllor,

Would be a shame if your answer to that consent question was not saved and would be required to answer each time you open up a video.

harlatan,

that would be illegal too, because that information is not strictly necessary for their service - they could only opt to not provide the service in the eu

Sphks,
@Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

There are multiple French websites that do this. It is legal (otherwise these websites would not do this anymore, it’s been a while).
There is a popup asking you if you consent to get cookies (for advertisement). If you say “no”, it leads you to another popup with two choices :

  • Change your decision and accept cookies
  • Pay for a premium service without advertisements
MrPozor,

Same in Germany and Switzerland. I just close the site immediately when I see this kind of blackmailing. Or use 12ft.io if I absolutely want to read the article.

Honytawk, (edited )

That is just because the people who enforce the EDPB guidelines just haven’t come around to fining those websites.

That practice is still illegal.

Want to speed up the process? You can report those websites. The more reports the faster those get punished.

Sphks,
@Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

No, that’s not that clear for the moment.

Let me explain the French case :

  • Webedia is a big company that owns most of the famous French websites (jeuxvideo.com , etc.). All these websites have cookie walls with an alternative : a paid subsription. What they say, is that the website is now accessible with subscription only. However, if you accept cookies, you’ll get a discount (free access).
  • The CNIL (a big French governemental entity) tried to forbid this. If someone reports a website, it’s for this entity to take action. There is no need to report Webedia, the CNIL knows already :-)
  • The Conseil d’Etat (juridical entity of the French gov) said that “non”, it’s OK for Webedia to use such paywalls. The CNIL can’t forbid Webedia to use them.
  • The CNIL asked the jusrists at the European level… here we are. We still don’t know.

Here is a French website where the CNIL explains this :
cnil.fr/…/cookie-walls-la-cnil-publie-des-premier…

harlatan,

Well, seems like my gdpr knowledge got too rusty. at least to me its an interesting topic to actualise

JasSmith,

I don’t agree. They can reasonably argue that advertising is a requirement of their business model, so it is necessary to advertise. Therefore it is necessary for them to block access to those blocking advertising. The directive cited isn’t intended to make advertiser supported services effectively illegal in the EU. That would be a massive own goal. It’s intended to make deceptive and unnecessary data collection illegal. Nothing YouTube is doing is deceptive. They’re being very clear about their intention to advertise to non-subscribers.

KLISHDFSDF,
@KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml avatar

A lot of the cookie notifications can’t collect data until you accept them (or follow their annoying “opt-out” workflow). If you install UBlock Origin and go to its settings > ‘Filter lists’ and enable the “EasyList - Cookie Notices” you can block a lot of cookies. If they can never nag you and you never opt in, assuming they’re following the law, you shouldn’t be tracked.

eek2121,

uBlock Origin has no issues with blocking ads.

I get trying to fight it via legal means, but it is a solved problem.

nicknoxx,

As an English person I thought yay that means us. Then I remembered. . .

TWeaK,

The EU ruling was in 2016, well before Brexit happened in 2019, so we should have the same law.

Viking_Hippie,

Except that EU court rulings don’t count in countries that stupidly left, no matter when they happened.

You could pass a similar law yourself, but that’s probably not going to happen with either the abysmal Tories or the feckless centrist party Keir “I want to be Tony Blair” Starmer has turned Labour into in charge 😮‍💨

TWeaK,

Nearly all EU rulings up until the UK left in 2019 are a part of British law. If the ruling was before the Brexit referendum then it would definitely count. Specifically with GDPR, the government confirmed that they adopted the EU’s law.

Furthermore, this isn’t a court ruling, it was a written reply from the European Commission, ie the people that wrote the law.

Viking_Hippie,

I guess I sit corrected and pleasantly surprised then 🙂

BlueMagma,

It’s nothing to do with GDPR acording to the link of the post (people should read more than headlines…)

TWeaK,

You’re right, it’s the ePrivacy Directive, which predates GDPR by many years (2002).

hiramfromthechi,
@hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world avatar
HiddenLayer5, (edited )

Not that the social media corps have ever given a shit.

HeavyRaptor,

They give a shit when they start getting fined based on a % of their revenue

sebinspace,

When it’s a percent of the revenue, it’s just the cost of doing business.

themurphy,

Very much not true.

The app Threads from Meta had to be rewritten due to its extensive tracking in the US market. Not legal in the EU.

TheBlue22,

Thank fuck for EU and GDPR

BlueMagma,

It’s nothing to do with GDPR acording to the link of the post (people should read more than headlines…)

Hasuris,

“when has the EU ever done anything for us”

Gorgeous_Sloth,

Oh it did.

folkrav,

Almost like something/someone can do some good on one side, and also do stupid stuff on the other. Wild concept, I know.

SneakyWeasel,

Don’t ask how, but my dad found out that at least with Ublock, cleaning the cache in the addon makes it bypass the stupid pop-up.

shasta,

Because they updated their filters so you have to clear the old cached filters

LinyosT,

Going to give a heads up that sometimes ublock origin can fall behind because google supposedly updates their anti-adblock BS twice a day. But all you need to do is be patient, give it some time and eventually UBO gets updated. Then you can clear cache and update your filters to block YT’s BS.

aceshigh,
@aceshigh@lemmy.world avatar

you can compare the version numbers and if they’re off, ubo will eventually update it.

mr_satan, (edited )
@mr_satan@monyet.cc avatar
gilbert31,

I’m happy to report that the vote was postponed because they did not have the votes for the proposal to pass. I know it is not a definitive victory because they will simply try to do it again, but it’s good that they failed once again.

mr_satan,
@mr_satan@monyet.cc avatar

Good to know, actually

Tranus,

You linked a webpage as an embedded image. If you meant to make a link, use:

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/

If you meant to embed: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/210211_chatcontrol-1-1320x1320.jpg

mr_satan,
@mr_satan@monyet.cc avatar

Thanks

Viking_Hippie,

Apart from the Orwellian scale and invasiveness of the whole thing, I also find the automatic inclusion of cops extremely troubling.

In most if not all countries, you don’t have to have done anything wrong in order for any interaction with cops to potentially harmful up to and including the risk of being murdered by them. And they’re just gonna automatically call them on every false positive of a likely extremely flawed algorithm 😬🤬

Pxtl,
@Pxtl@lemmy.ca avatar

… We’re gonna get another cookie click-through, aren’t we?

ninekeysdown,
@ninekeysdown@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, pretty much

dx1,

Do you consent to our use of intrusive browser detection, anti-cheat, rootkit usage and invasive brain implants to bombard you with ads?

Yes | Also yes but more annoying to click through

jtk,

The cookie banner law should have specified the exact text that had to be displayed and it should have been really scary.

Octopus1348,

I think the law should require a button for enabling all non-marketing cookies.

Jako301,

The law already states that it must be as easy to deselect everything as it is to select all.

If they have a allow all button, they also need a allow only required button.

Octopus1348,

Allow only essential doesn’t include analytics cookies, allow all includes everything. They should either make it easy with maximum 3 checkboxes but you can still unfold them to precisely manage, or make a button to disable only marketing cookies.

Viking_Hippie,

Well clearly many if not most sites are in violation of that part. Will be very interesting to see what, if anything, the EU are gonna do about that!

Personally I’m pessimisticly hopeful and yes that’s a possible thing shut up 😝

TWeaK,

Google: You will accept our legitimate interest and you will like it.

spiderman,

EU to the rescue again!

PM_ME_FEET_PICS,

Rescue lol. The EU is singlehandedly bringing forth the end of online privacy.

mint_tamas,

Really interested in your thought process here

JiveTurkey,

Probably referring to this. www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/

Serpardum,

EU wants to make sure I see ads? Screw that. Freaking capitalists. Seems the US doesn’t have a monopoly on capatalism.

BearGun,

Huh? This is about youtube wanting to make sure you see ads, and people complaining to the EU to make them censure youtube for it. Not sure where you got that EU wants to make sure you see ads.

phoenixz,

Eh, no, it’s the exact opposite of that.

DemBoSain,
@DemBoSain@midwest.social avatar

They’re probably talking about the anti-encrypted message regulations. EU wants to make end-to-end messengers illegal to “protect the children”.

wizzor,

You should all go file a complaint with a data protection agency.

The thread in the linked social network suggests concentrating the complaints to the Irish DPC: forms.dataprotection.ie/contact

7heo, (edited )
@7heo@lemmy.ml avatar

expired

wizzor,

I didn’t know either, but I figured any option is better, the filings are read by humans after all. Still, as another poster pointed out, the agency is already investigating.

gilbert31,

It seems like it worked, the same guy published an update asking people to stop filing the same complaint again and again. The agency is looking into it.

wizzor,

Thanks for highlighting this, I might have missed it otherwise.

A2PKXG,

Do you wish for more consent popups or do you hope that youtube is afraid of causing friction and will go back to how things were?

frequenttimetraveler,
@frequenttimetraveler@lemmy.world avatar

This is frivolous and ridiculous.

If europeans had spent as much time building youtube competitors as they spent trying to find holes to litigate, europe would be richer

r0m2,
@r0m2@lemmy.world avatar

Are you aware that Dailymotion, arguably Youtube’s most serious competitor, is a French company?

We did just what you suggested.

Now it’s time for internet giants to play by the rules (e.g., privacy-wise, tax-wise), or there will never be room for competition.

frequenttimetraveler,
@frequenttimetraveler@lemmy.world avatar

good thing that it is tiny so it is not affected by the DSA

yamanii,
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

There are plenty already, why aren’t you using them?

frequenttimetraveler,
@frequenttimetraveler@lemmy.world avatar

there were . Does dailymotion still even exist?

It’s easier than ever to host things now, but EU laws ensure it would be sued to oblivion and die within a month.

demosthememes, (edited )

I only just posted a meme about the EU flooring companies for going against their regulations. It was my first post too :)
I’d really like to add YouTube to it. Godspeed.
Image

pineapplelover,

The only government actually doing shit. *Also, California

eestileib,

All these fuckers are our neighbors and for many of us former employers.

We know exactly how they think, and what they think of us.

Andreesen is the tip of the iceberg.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines