@briankrebs I am sorry, but their logic at the most basic level is extremely flawed. Since there is no social contract connected to their "assets", their identity doesn't matter when things go wrong. It then becomes a variation of the computerized voting / electronic ballot conundrum: Anonymous high-stakes transactions are extremely vulnerable to theft and tampering. There is no quick or slow fix for that.
But hey cryptobugs, buy the techno-tinctures, split your assets and do your digital calisthenics. You see? We have nice, simple nostrums we'll keep repeating, because we are the Church of Computers Can Do Anything Any Way We Want (because the pretty clicky icons and line-go-up hype says we can).
A fundamentally new type of computer with software stack to match might possibly change that situation. But what I'm seeing from the cultists are a bunch of impressive-sounding but misapplied measures like the tech found in hardware wallets (which might as well be called "speed bumps").