I'm a bit confused. Those with concealed pistol licenses have done all the work with classes and registration and background checks.... so the government knows a lot about them and proving that they're a citizen willing to be a responsible gun owner.
I see nothing in this article to suggest the gunman had a concealed license, so why are they restricting the very folks who might be a help?
Feel-good politics and the sidestepping of responsibility for any future incidents. "We did something!"
EDIT: If you're downvoting, I acknowledge that this is a matter students, faculty and staff take seriously, and for good reason. Please join the conversation.
“I want visitors and those that come to work here every day to understand that, irrespective of external circumstances, our building remains a secure haven..."
OK. Well, since guns are the problem, get rid of the ones MSP carries in there as well.
When "March for Our Lives" held an event at the Capitol in late March of this year, March To Defend Lives organized a few blocks away at Wentworth Park. It's still way too close for legislators' comfort.
At least we're talking about it. I know the opposition will make this sound like ARs will be carried everywhere, but it's an opportunity to show them this isn't the whacko position they say it is. Several states and schools already do it.
Michigan Guns
Hot