@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

BrikoX

@BrikoX@lemmy.zip

Have strong opinions, but I welcome any civil fact-based discussion.

Alt account: /u/BrikoX@lemmy.sdf.org

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

BrikoX,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

It was an interesting read. Thanks.

And while there are many points I agree with, the core principle that China wants to use trade to export autocracy just doesn’t mesh. Trade is the best way to prevent military conflicts since trade creates dependencies which would be cut off during any military action. I would say the opposite is happening now with the current wave of protectionism in both the US and China.

China will take opportunities to insert themselves in other countries when it suits them, but it’s no different from what democratic countries do. Just look at Africa and how to this day France refuses to abandon its economic influence they hold via CFA franc currency. Or US trying to insert democratic rule in countries that have strategic value to them by any means necessary (the publication mentions US abandoned strategy), but we know it’s not true. There are public details about US coup attempts in Venezuela just recently.

BrikoX,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

I mostly agree in general, but in Slack case there is a lot of proprietary information involved, so they might have some more serious legal issues.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • rosin
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • vwfavf
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines